Bombing the host country natos

Before joining as a full member, the Host Country was a Permanent Observer to the Organization, as well as an active member of many of its specialized agencies, programmes, funds, and the Conference on Disarmament. For further information on the Host Country Agreement, please refer to the section devoted to the Legal Liaison under the Chapter on the Director-General follow the link. With the Office of the Director-General as the central interlocutor, UNOG maintains close and constructive relations with the Swiss authorities at both federal and cantonal levels. Many questions relate to the Host Country Agreement.

Bombing the host country natos

Yugoslavia Note that these countries represent roughly one-third of the people on earth. This list makes it seem clear that the United States has been as bellicose as any other country in the history of the world. At least, it seems clear to non-Americans.

Recent Posts

Less clear are the reasons behind the bellicosity, the reasons that so few Americans realize how bellicose they are, and the reasons that so many Americans believe their country to be peaceable and benign. Two concrete mechanisms can explain this situation, one animal and one historical, each reinforcing the other.

First, Americans have the same hormones as all other homo sapiens. This renders them as intrinsically self-protective and agressive as any other people. Second, America's geographic isolation has led Americans to be uninterested in the rest of the world, so that their educational system and sources of news have always tended to be insular and parochial, leaving most of them—both the electors and the elected—poorly informed.

War is often the result.

NATO - Wikipedia

See Out of the Ashes for some blatant examples of this, or consider Laos. Laos is a poor, land-locked country halfway around the world from the United States. It has no natural resources of any significance and hardly any people, only six million now and a mere two million during the s.

No country on earth could be or could ever have been less of a threat to the United States yet in the s the White House and Pentagon managed to imagine one—a threat so dire and insidious that they had to keep it under wraps.

They did not dare to explain it even to Congress, for fear Congress might not have permitted them to deal with it appropriately. They handled it in secret instead. To save America from that threat, an ad hoc air force run by the CIA dropped more explosives on Laos than the official air force dropped on Germany during all of the Second World War.

Laotians saw more bombs dropped on them per capita than any other people in the history of the world. Again, Laotians saw this, Americans did not. This was never on TV, this was done in secret. Most Americans still have no idea of the outrage their country committed.

The occasion for the bombing was a modest civil insurrection by a relatively few poor peasants against the king and kleptocrats who controlled the nation. The United States took the side of the latter and made war against the peasants, not only against those peasants who were fighting but also against those who were not.

American planes rained down not just high explosives but also vast numbers of cluster bombs—aerial anti-personnel mines that are directed specifically against non-combatants. Those were and continue to be especially effective against children, because many of them do not explode when dropped but do explode when a child picks them up.

This stragtegy had the predictable effect: Eventually the American side lost.

Bombing the host country natos

Needless to say, the United States suffered no ill consequences. To anyone with a modicum of perspective, it was and remains inconceivable how anyone could have believed Laos to be a threat to the security of the United States, and it is even less conceivable how bombing the country could have been thought to be beneficial.

However, Americans naively believe that a free press must be an informative press, so they remain ignorant of the world. Reality is complex and ambiguous. It is most accurately outlined by knowledgable people willing to test their conclusions in public.

In contrast, the reality of the White House and Pentagon is largely defined by employees of secret organizations, employees who are paid to be secretive if not paranoid.

Those employees purvey information gleaned from professional previcators—i. The agents dealing with those spies and informants are likely to know too little of a culture and its language to order dinner in a native restaurant but they will have no problem believing that they can assess the accuracy and completeness of what is told to them and send it out as inside dope.

This "information" is no more than glorified rumour but it is then not tested through the public scrutiny of independent experts, people who might actually speak the language of an informant, it is put through a military or quasi-military hierarchy.North Korea was the last country on the list to develop nuclear weapons in , while the US was the first in , with Russia following a close second in More about Nuclear War World.

NATO Nuclear Policies. What is NATO? This is primarily a US responsibility assisted as practicable by other nations.” the US President would authorize their use in case of war and hand them over for use by the host country’s military.

In Bombing the Host Country - Nato’s Assault on Yugoslavia. Topics: Kosovo, United Nations University Press, , p.

Bombing the host country natos

units.3 Despite threats of sanctions by the international community, the Yugoslav government continued to raze villages, killing more than people by June and driving thousands across the border into.

The All-American Bombardier The occasion for the bombing was a modest civil insurrection by a relatively few poor peasants against the king and kleptocrats who controlled the nation. The United States took the side of the latter and made war against the peasants, not only against those peasants who were fighting but also against those who.

In business, Home country refers to the country where the headquarters is located whereas host country refers to the foreign countries where the company invests. This is the key difference between home country and host country. The first air strike under president Trump occurred in Yemen; a Jan.

21, bombing reportedly killed three Al Qaeda operatives.

Nuclear arsenals | ICAN